Add a setting to control whether to respect advisory rate limits

This commit is contained in:
Tyrrrz 2025-02-06 20:48:52 +02:00
parent f31e73bb7a
commit b34ab51b86
7 changed files with 149 additions and 27 deletions

View file

@ -27,8 +27,19 @@ public abstract class DiscordCommandBase : ICommand
)]
public bool IsBotToken { get; init; } = false;
[CommandOption(
"respect-rate-limits",
Description = "Whether to respect advisory rate limits. "
+ "If disabled, only hard rate limits (i.e. 429 responses) will be respected."
)]
public bool ShouldRespectRateLimits { get; init; } = true;
private DiscordClient? _discordClient;
protected DiscordClient Discord => _discordClient ??= new DiscordClient(Token);
protected DiscordClient Discord =>
_discordClient ??= new DiscordClient(
Token,
ShouldRespectRateLimits ? RateLimitPreference.RespectAll : RateLimitPreference.IgnoreAll
);
public virtual ValueTask ExecuteAsync(IConsole console)
{

View file

@ -18,7 +18,10 @@ using JsonExtensions.Reading;
namespace DiscordChatExporter.Core.Discord;
public class DiscordClient(string token)
public class DiscordClient(
string token,
RateLimitPreference rateLimitPreference = RateLimitPreference.RespectAll
)
{
private readonly Uri _baseUri = new("https://discord.com/api/v10/", UriKind.Absolute);
private TokenKind? _resolvedTokenKind;
@ -47,33 +50,43 @@ public class DiscordClient(string token)
innerCancellationToken
);
// If this was the last request available before hitting the rate limit,
// wait out the reset time so that future requests can succeed.
// This may add an unnecessary delay in case the user doesn't intend to
// make any more requests, but implementing a smarter solution would
// require properly keeping track of Discord's global/per-route/per-resource
// rate limits and that's just way too much effort.
// https://discord.com/developers/docs/topics/rate-limits
var remainingRequestCount = response
.Headers.TryGetValue("X-RateLimit-Remaining")
?.Pipe(s => int.Parse(s, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
var resetAfterDelay = response
.Headers.TryGetValue("X-RateLimit-Reset-After")
?.Pipe(s => double.Parse(s, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture))
.Pipe(TimeSpan.FromSeconds);
if (remainingRequestCount <= 0 && resetAfterDelay is not null)
// Discord has advisory rate limits (communicated via response headers), but they are typically
// way stricter than the actual rate limits enforced by the server.
// The user may choose to ignore the advisory rate limits and only retry on hard rate limits,
// if they want to prioritize speed over compliance (and safety of their account).
// This is especially relevant for user accounts, as the advisory rate limits sometimes don't
// make any sense there.
// https://github.com/Tyrrrz/DiscordChatExporter/issues/1021
if (rateLimitPreference.ShouldRespect(tokenKind))
{
var delay =
// Adding a small buffer to the reset time reduces the chance of getting
// rate limited again, because it allows for more requests to be released.
(resetAfterDelay.Value + TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1))
// Sometimes Discord returns an absurdly high value for the reset time, which
// is not actually enforced by the server. So we cap it at a reasonable value.
.Clamp(TimeSpan.Zero, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(60));
var remainingRequestCount = response
.Headers.TryGetValue("X-RateLimit-Remaining")
?.Pipe(s => int.Parse(s, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
await Task.Delay(delay, innerCancellationToken);
var resetAfterDelay = response
.Headers.TryGetValue("X-RateLimit-Reset-After")
?.Pipe(s => double.Parse(s, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture))
.Pipe(TimeSpan.FromSeconds);
// If this was the last request available before hitting the rate limit,
// wait out the reset time so that future requests can succeed.
// This may add an unnecessary delay in case the user doesn't intend to
// make any more requests, but implementing a smarter solution would
// require properly keeping track of Discord's global/per-route/per-resource
// rate limits and that's just way too much effort.
// https://discord.com/developers/docs/topics/rate-limits
if (remainingRequestCount <= 0 && resetAfterDelay is not null)
{
var delay =
// Adding a small buffer to the reset time reduces the chance of getting
// rate limited again, because it allows for more requests to be released.
(resetAfterDelay.Value + TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1))
// Sometimes Discord returns an absurdly high value for the reset time, which
// is not actually enforced by the server. So we cap it at a reasonable value.
.Clamp(TimeSpan.Zero, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(60));
await Task.Delay(delay, innerCancellationToken);
}
}
return response;

View file

@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
using System;
namespace DiscordChatExporter.Core.Discord;
[Flags]
public enum RateLimitPreference
{
IgnoreAll = 0,
RespectForUserRequests = 0b1,
RespectForBotRequests = 0b10,
RespectAll = RespectForUserRequests | RespectForBotRequests,
}
public static class RateLimitPreferenceExtensions
{
internal static bool ShouldRespect(
this RateLimitPreference rateLimitPreference,
TokenKind tokenKind
) =>
tokenKind == TokenKind.Bot
? (rateLimitPreference & RateLimitPreference.RespectForBotRequests) != 0
: (rateLimitPreference & RateLimitPreference.RespectForUserRequests) != 0;
public static string GetDisplayName(this RateLimitPreference rateLimitPreference) =>
rateLimitPreference switch
{
RateLimitPreference.IgnoreAll => "Always ignore",
RateLimitPreference.RespectForUserRequests => "Respect for user requests",
RateLimitPreference.RespectForBotRequests => "Respect for bot requests",
RateLimitPreference.RespectAll => "Always respect",
_ => throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(rateLimitPreference)),
};
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
using System;
using System.Globalization;
using Avalonia.Data.Converters;
using DiscordChatExporter.Core.Discord;
namespace DiscordChatExporter.Gui.Converters;
public class RateLimitPreferenceToStringConverter : IValueConverter
{
public static RateLimitPreferenceToStringConverter Instance { get; } = new();
public object? Convert(
object? value,
Type targetType,
object? parameter,
CultureInfo culture
) =>
value is RateLimitPreference rateLimitPreference
? rateLimitPreference.GetDisplayName()
: default;
public object ConvertBack(
object? value,
Type targetType,
object? parameter,
CultureInfo culture
) => throw new NotSupportedException();
}

View file

@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ using System.IO;
using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
using Cogwheel;
using CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.ComponentModel;
using DiscordChatExporter.Core.Discord;
using DiscordChatExporter.Core.Exporting;
using DiscordChatExporter.Gui.Framework;
using DiscordChatExporter.Gui.Models;
@ -46,6 +47,13 @@ public partial class SettingsService()
set => SetProperty(ref _isTokenPersisted, value);
}
private RateLimitPreference _rateLimitPreference = RateLimitPreference.RespectAll;
public RateLimitPreference RateLimitPreference
{
get => _rateLimitPreference;
set => SetProperty(ref _rateLimitPreference, value);
}
private ThreadInclusionMode _threadInclusionMode;
public ThreadInclusionMode ThreadInclusionMode
{

View file

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using DiscordChatExporter.Core.Discord;
using DiscordChatExporter.Core.Utils.Extensions;
using DiscordChatExporter.Gui.Framework;
using DiscordChatExporter.Gui.Models;
@ -42,6 +43,15 @@ public class SettingsViewModel : DialogViewModelBase
set => _settingsService.IsTokenPersisted = value;
}
public IReadOnlyList<RateLimitPreference> AvailableRateLimitPreferences { get; } =
Enum.GetValues<RateLimitPreference>();
public RateLimitPreference RateLimitPreference
{
get => _settingsService.RateLimitPreference;
set => _settingsService.RateLimitPreference = value;
}
public IReadOnlyList<ThreadInclusionMode> AvailableThreadInclusionModes { get; } =
Enum.GetValues<ThreadInclusionMode>();

View file

@ -54,6 +54,25 @@
<ToggleSwitch DockPanel.Dock="Right" IsChecked="{Binding IsTokenPersisted}" />
</DockPanel>
<!-- Rate limit preference -->
<DockPanel
Margin="16,8"
LastChildFill="False"
ToolTip.Tip="Whether to respect advisory rate limits. If disabled, only hard rate limits (i.e. 429 responses) will be respected.">
<TextBlock DockPanel.Dock="Left" Text="Rate limit preference" />
<ComboBox
Width="150"
DockPanel.Dock="Right"
ItemsSource="{Binding AvailableRateLimitPreferences}"
SelectedItem="{Binding RateLimitPreference}">
<ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Converter={x:Static converters:RateLimitPreferenceToStringConverter.Instance}}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
</ComboBox>
</DockPanel>
<!-- Thread inclusion mode -->
<DockPanel
Margin="16,8"